Information and the Information Economy Schedule

Panel 1: The Changing Economics of Information Industries

Information and communication technologies are transforming the organization of electronic media and information industries.  Digitization, gradually increasing broadband access, the availability of multiple fixed and mobile platforms, and advances in computing and electronics are changing the economics of these sectors.  Peer-to-peer networks, user-generated content, ubiquitous computing and ambient intelligence are only the tip of some of the developments.  Generic trends include the migration to next-generation networks that seamlessly integrate different technological platforms, the redrawing of boundaries between converging and diverging services and applications, the ability to gather enhanced consumer and audience behavior data, the proliferation of new ad-supported services, and increasing communications among machines (the “Internet of Things”).  In this introductory session we address these broader developments and their implications for sector economics and policy.

Chair:
Johannes Bauer
Quello Center for Telecommunication Management and Law, Michigan State University

Panelists:
Nicholas Economides, Stern School of Business, New York University
Eli Noam, Columbia University School of Business
Steve Wildman, Quello Center for Telecommunication Management and Law, Michigan State University
Christopher Yoo, University of Pennsylvania School of Law

Panel 2: Information Sources, the New Media Environment, and the Democratic Process

Policymakers have become increasingly cognizant of the need to understand the role of various media and information sources in citizens’ decision-making.  At the same time, the media environment has grown increasingly complex, raising questions about whether the reconfigured media environment and the new dynamics of media usage are having a positive or a negative effect on citizen knowledge and political participation.  Factors ranging from the increased flow of information across traditional geographic and market boundaries, to the greater diversity of available content options, to the blurring of the traditional distinction between media consumers and media producers, all have potentially dramatic ramifications for the relationship between information and the democratic process.  This panel explores cutting edge thinking and research on the relationship between the new media environment and political decision-making, and the extent these dynamics can or should be addressed by communications policymakers.

Chair:

Panelists:
Markus Prior, Department of Politics, Princeton University
W. Russell Neuman, Department of Communication, University of Michigan
Ellen P. Goodman, Rutgers University School of Law
Robert Entman, School of Media and Public Affairs, George Washington University

Panel 3: Information Access:  Legal Rules and Market Forces

Access to information has emerged as the central feature of the digital economy of the 21st Century.  In the United States, recent judicial and regulatory decisions, as well as legislative moves, have diminished government’s power, both on the state and federal level, to regulate and control communications firms’ decisions to provide access to competitors and customers.  At the same time, mergers and proposed mergers among the biggest telephone carriers, satellites companies, and internet backbones appear to have concentrated control of access into fewer hands.  Debate over the effects of these changes have focused in the “network neutrality” controversy—concerning whether federal law should mandate some level of interconnection and/or access to internet users.   This panel brings to bear the insights of economics, communications scholarship, and the law to examine the effects, good or bad, of less legal and regulatory control over information access.  Given the complexity of communications technology, the rapidity of market change, and the much-predicted “convergence” of communications platforms, the panel will explore whether and/or which legal rules can effectively further access.

Chair:
Adam Candeub
College of Law, Michigan State University

Panelists:
Brett M. Frischmann, Loyola University School of Law, Chicago
Simon Wilkie, Center for Communication Law and Policy, University of Southern California
Kevin Werbach, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Barbara Cherry, Department of Telecommunications, Indiana University

Panel 4: Information and Decision-Making in Media and Communications Policymaking

Policy decision-making on matters related to our media and communications environment not only affects the economics of one of our most vital industry sectors, but also the cultural and political dimensions of American life.  For these reasons, this decision-making process has been – and should continue to be – placed under intensive scrutiny.  Contemporary media and communications policymaking takes place in a contentious, highly-charged environment, with multiple stakeholders advocating for a wide range of policy outcomes, and with ever more rigorous demands being placed on policymakers to support and justify their decisions.  This panel explores the dynamics of contemporary media and communications policy decision-making and the role that information can and should play in this process.  This panel considers recent charges that the process has become increasingly politicized, as well as the somewhat contradictory charges that the process has become overly bureaucratized and data-driven.  In addressing these issues, this panel considers the implications of recent occurrences such as the apparent suppression of research within the FCC, conflicts over access to policy-relevant data, and ongoing efforts to assess the quality and integrity of the data relied upon by policymakers in their decision-making.

Chair:
Philip M. Napoli
Graduate School of Business, McGannon Center, Fordham University

Panelists:
Drew Clark, BroadbandCensus.com
Joe Karaganis, Social Science Research Council
Angela Campbell, Georgetown University School of Law
Lili Levi, University of Miami School of Law

Panel 5: Ownership, Information, and the Regulation of Standards

Exchange of information requires a language—whether a human language or a technical or digital standard.  The decision of which language or standard a major communications medium will use often involves intricate policy questions, having significant bearing on how information is exchanged.  We see these issues in the debates about the conversion to digital standards for broadcast television, the FCC’s requirement that cable systems provide the protocols to allow standardized navigation devices, the interoperability of satellite radio receivers, and the use of interoperability of cell phones on different networks. 

Chair:
Steve Wildman
Quello Center for Telecommunication Management and Law, Michigan State University

Panelists:
J. Gregory Sidak, International Institute for Competition Law & Economics
D. Linda Garcia, Communication, Culture & Technology Program, Georgetown University
Jeffrey Hart, Department of Political Science, Indiana University