Skip to main content, skip to search, or skip to the top of the page.

The Kelley Institute
Law of Lawyering
Supreme Court Review

Cases tagged as: habeas corpus

Christeson v. Roper

135 S. Ct. 891 (2015) (PDF)

When a death row inmate’s appointed attorneys had missed the filing deadline for his first federal habeas petition and could not be expected to argue that the inmate was entitled to equitable tolling of the statute of limitations, the district court abused its discretion in denying a motion for the appointment of substitute, conflict-free counsel.

Related tag(s): 2014 Term , attorney-client relationship, habeas corpus, ineffective assistance of counsel, right to counsel, sixth amendment,

Davis v. Ayala

135 S. Ct. 2187 (2015) (PDF)

Exclusion of Defendant’s attorney from part of an ex parte Batson hearing was harmless error. There was no basis for finding that the Defendant suffered actual prejudice.

Related tag(s): 2014 Term , attorney-client relationship, habeas corpus, right to counsel, sixth amendment,

Jefferson v. Upton

130 S. Ct. 2217 (2010) (PDF)

On habeas corpus review of a claim by a state prison inmate who was under death sentence, the federal court held to have erred under the former version of 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254(d), by not fully considering all of the potentially applicable exceptions to statutory presumption of correctness.

Related tag(s): 2009 Term, attorney-client relationship, habeas corpus, ineffective assistance of counsel, sixth amendment,

Jennings v. Stephens

135 S. Ct. 793 (2014) (PDF)

A prisoner who sought federal habeas relief based on three theories of ineffective assistance of counsel and prevailed in the district court on two of them is not required to file a cross-appeal in order to urge an alternative ground for relief or seek a certificate of appealability on the third theory.

Related tag(s): 2014 Term , attorney-client relationship, habeas corpus, ineffective assistance of counsel, right to counsel, sixth amendment,

Ryan v. Gonzalez

133 S. Ct. 696 (2013) (PDF)

Alongside Tibbals v. Carter, the Court held that neither 18 U.S.C Section 3599 nor 18 U.S.C Section 4241 provides a right to suspend the prisoner's federal habeas corpus proceedings.

Related tag(s): 2012 Term, habeas corpus, right to counsel,

Tibbals v. Carter

133 S. Ct. 696 (2013) (PDF)

Alongside Ryan v. Gonzales, the Court held that neither 18 U.S.C Section 3599 nor 18 U.S.C Section 4241 provides a right to suspend the prisoner's federal habeas corpus proceedings.

Related tag(s): 2012 Term, habeas corpus, ineffective assistance of counsel,

Woods v. Donald

135 S. Ct. 1372 (2015) (PDF)

Supreme Court held that attorney’s brief absence during testimony concerning other defendants was no per se ineffective assistance of counsel under United States v. Cronic.

Related tag(s): 2014 Term , attorney-client relationship, habeas corpus, ineffective assistance of counsel, right to counsel, sixth amendment,


Skip to main content, skip to search, or skip to the top of the page.